Theo and I tested the TR-1 motor on Saturday and
unfortunately suffered a cato. It was an impressive sounding motor for
that first few milliseconds though. Apparently I should have rethought my
decision to use Dextrose in place of Sorbitol. On paper the change seemed
fine but I had limited experience with Dextrose and never in something of this
size. The actual casting of the grain segments went fine but I
experienced some slumping in two of segments that I cast. At the time I decided
that the slumping was due to having removed the segments in question too soon
from the mould. I believe that segment slump either contributed to or was
the direct cause of the cato. Fortunately I had cast an extra segment and
at the end of the day, long after the firing, that segment which had been stored
in the same conditions as some similarly sized Sorbitol segments that Rick had
cast had slumped. The sorbitol segments remained fine. The dextrose segment had slumped so severely
that the core was essentially gone. I
know of many folks that have use dextrose based propellants with no reports of
slumping so I’m unclear of the reason, maybe the size of the segments? For now I will switch back to Sorbitol in the
TR-1 motor and save the dextrose for some much smaller scale motor testing. We had a good time regardless. The guys at FAR were very helpful, and the
site had grown quite a bit since our last visit there some three years or so
ago. Rick Maschek also provided lots of assitance and camera work. Rick also had a nice firing of a KNSB motor with a Double-D grain configuration. The third photo is of Rick's firing. The last photo is af an AP motor firing that anomther FAR member (Erik, I think) conducted.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment